What is the EU AI Act?
The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is the EU’s first comprehensive AI law. It classifies AI systems by risk, bans certain practices and sets obligations for providers and deployers, such as transparency, AI literacy and human oversight.

EU AI Act: definition and purpose
The EU AI Act has been in force since August 1, 2024 and applies directly in all member states. It is meant to enable innovation while protecting fundamental rights, safety and trust. Unlike the GDPR, it is not tied to personal data but to the use of AI systems and their risk.
The obligations apply in stages: bans and the AI literacy obligation since February 2, 2025, rules for general-purpose AI models since August 2, 2025 and most of the remaining provisions from August 2, 2026; further deadlines follow for high-risk systems in products. For individual obligations there are transitional rules and proposed amendments, so the current status should be checked.
Risk levels and roles
The regulation distinguishes four levels. Unacceptable risks are banned, such as social scoring or manipulative systems. High-risk systems, for example for recruitment, creditworthiness assessment or education, are subject to strict requirements. Transparency obligations apply to systems such as chatbots. Most other applications with minimal risk remain largely free.
The role matters: providers develop an AI system or place it on the market under their own name; deployers use it under their own responsibility. Most mid-sized companies are deployers. Anyone who substantially modifies a system or offers it under their own brand can, however, become a provider themselves.
Real-world example: a supplier reviews its AI use
A supplier with several hundred employees uses three AI applications: a chatbot in customer service, a text assistant for internal documents and a tool that pre-sorts job applications. The chatbot needs a notice that users are talking to an AI. The text assistant is uncritical but requires trained staff.
The applicant pre-screening probably falls into the high-risk category. The company must use it according to the instructions, ensure human oversight, keep logs and inform employees. Many companies deliberately choose human pre-screening or a vetted provider here. What matters is to justify the classification properly and to record who in the company is responsible for use and oversight.
What companies should check now
Begin with an inventory of all AI applications, including functions in purchased software. Assign each one a risk level and a role, name responsible persons, train employees and document the result. For prohibited practices, fines of up to €35 million or 7 percent of worldwide annual turnover are possible.
Nano Concepts helps with the technical inventory, with transparency notices and with logging in AI applications. You should clarify the legal assessment in an individual case with a lawyer so that classification and obligations fit your specific use. This article does not replace legal advice.
- Record all AI systems in use and assign each a risk level
- Clarify the role: provider or deployer
- Train employees and document AI literacy
- Plan transparency notices for chatbots and AI content
- Ask providers about conformity and documentation
Frequently asked questions about EU AI Act (AI regulation)
To providers and deployers of AI systems used in the EU, even if the company is based outside the EU. Mid-sized companies that merely buy and use AI are also affected as deployers, though with fewer obligations than providers.
Since February 2, 2025, providers and deployers must ensure that staff and other people who work with AI systems have a sufficient level of AI literacy. This can be achieved through training and clear rules, adapted to the task and prior knowledge.
Yes, within the meaning of the regulation these are AI systems or models. Transparency obligations usually apply, such as users being able to tell that they are interacting with an AI. Stricter obligations apply only if the intended purpose is classified as high-risk.
Fines are tiered. For prohibited practices, up to €35 million or 7 percent of worldwide annual turnover is possible, with lower maximum amounts for other violations. What matters is what the supervisory authorities set in each individual case.
Matching services

AI Consulting
Potential analysis, prioritized AI use cases and a realistic roadmap – from a team that also implements AI.
Learn more
AI Integration & Chatbots
Chatbots, assistants and AI workflows that answer inquiries, analyze data and qualify leads.
Learn more
Technology Consulting
Software selection, architecture, code review and a digitalization roadmap – independent and implementation-oriented.
Learn moreRelated terms
Relevant for these industries
Related magazine articles

How to Configure GA4: Events, Key Events and Rollout
Google Analytics 4 only delivers reliable numbers when events, key events and consent are planned. Here is how to build a tracking plan that rolls out cleanly.
Read more
Prioritizing Technical Debt: Pay the Interest or Pay It Down?
Technical debt is not a synonym for bad code – it becomes dangerous when it stays invisible. Here is how to assess legacy burdens by impact and effort and reduce them in a plannable way.
Read more
Digital Transformation for SMEs: Roadmap, Data, Change
Digital transformation in mid-sized companies rarely fails because of missing tools but because of unclear goals and isolated solutions. Here is how a target picture, priorities and a data foundation lead to measurable results.
Read more